top of page
pexels-sliceisop-2529185.jpg

What the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Says About Contracts

RCP Policy Brief

In its 2024 Policy Brief, "What the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) Says About Contracts," RCP analyzes the content of the CSDDD with respect to commercial contracts—one of the key tools that companies are expected to employ in meeting their human rights and environmental due diligence (HREDD) obligations. We invite you to download a PDF of the brief below or access it on SSRN

In August 2025, RCP published an academic article that offers a more extensive textual analysis and a deeper dive into the dos and don'ts of due diligence-aligned contracting of the CSDDD, available on SSRN.

 

In May 2026, the RCP Team conducted a further analysis of the CSDDD in light of Omnibus I, a series of amendments to the CSDDD adopted by the European Commission through Directive 2026/470 EU. Our analysis is available on the Oxford Business Law Blog here. You may also download it as a PDF. 

 

CSDDD_policy_brief_edited.png

RCP Policy Brief

We invite you to download the RCP Policy Brief: "What the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Says About Contracts"

On July 5, 2024, the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. It entered into force on July 25, 2024, and Member States will have to transpose the Directive into national law by July 26, 2026.

 

In this Policy Brief, "What the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) Says About Contracts," RCP analyzes the content of the CSDDD with respect to commercial contracts—one of the key tools that companies are expected to employ in meeting their human rights and environmental due diligence (HREDD) obligations.
 

We invite you to download a PDF of the brief on our website or access it on SSRN.

CSDDD_policy_brief_edited.png

RCP Policy Brief

We invite you to download the RCP Policy Brief: "What the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Says About Contracts."

RCP Toolkit Cover Mockups 1 (6)_edited.png

Academic Article

We invite you to read the 2025 journal article, which offers a more extensive textual analysis and delves deeper into the dos and don’ts of due diligence-aligned contracting in the CSDDD and contracts.

moving_toward_shared_Oxford_Bus_Law

Article

We invite you to download RCP's latest analysis of how companies' risk-shifting approach to contracting should change in light of Omnibus I, a series of amendments to the CSDDD finalized in February 2026. 

Summary Chart:
The Dos and Don'ts of CSDDD-Aligned Contracting

Dos

Don'ts

Share contractual responsibility for HREDD.

Commit to cooperate to address adverse impacts in an on-going, risk-based, and dynamic fashion to incentivize transparency and trust.

Commit to responsible purchasing practices and fair commercial terms with all partners, but especially SMEs . Where possible, commit the seller to do the same with its sellers.

Commit to fair commercial terms that can support effective HREDD.

Ensure that HREDD-related costs are fairly distributed in the contract, based on the parties’ respective capacities and resources. Ensure that business partners have the capacity and support needed to meet HREDD requirements. This is important for all partners, but especially SMEs.

Jointly prioritize human rights and environmental remediation over suspension, cancelation, and termination. Clarify termination is a last resort. 

Use contracts simply to transfer HREDD responsibilities and obligations to business partners.

Use contracts to establish one-sided (supplier-only) obligations on a strict liability basis where any imperfection is a breach + partners are incentivized to hide problems.

Ignore the reality that the buyer’s purchasing practices can contribute to, or jointly cause, and aggravate adverse impacts.

Use contracts to formalize unfair commercial terms that can aggravate adverse impacts.

Overwhelm suppliers with unreasonable HREDD expectations, obligations, and informational requirements (e.g., questionnaires, scorecards, reports).

Aggravate the risk of adverse impacts via immediate (zero-tolerance) termination rights.

“Cut and run” at the first sign of HREDD-related trouble.

Commit to exiting responsibly by giving reasonable notice and taking measures to mitigate the impacts of termination.

UNGC fireside chat

Latest News

Events

  • May 2026 — Check back soon for updates!

Have questions?

Want to learn more?

Have questions?

Want to learn more?

In Collaboration with

rutgers_law_logo_edited.jpg
laudes_logo_edited.jpg
linklaters_logo_edited.jpg
ICCR_logo_edited.jpg
fairwear_logo_edited.jpg
rutgers_corp_law_edited.jpg
world_cc_edited.jpg
allens_links_logo.png
giz_logo.png
idh_logo_rectangle.png
bottom of page